Big Salkehatchie Cypress Co. v. Colleton Cypress Co.

98 S.E. 131, 111 S.C. 353, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 25
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 21, 1919
Docket10124
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 S.E. 131 (Big Salkehatchie Cypress Co. v. Colleton Cypress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Big Salkehatchie Cypress Co. v. Colleton Cypress Co., 98 S.E. 131, 111 S.C. 353, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 25 (S.C. 1919).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Peurifoy, dissolving an interlocutory order of injunction-granted by him. The primary question involved in the case as made by the exceptions is whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from'cutting and removing timber on the land in question pending a trial on the merits. This point is raised by the first five exceptions of the appellant. These exceptions must be suustained. The allegations of the pleadings and evidence submitted at the hearing are such as necessitate a trial on the merits in order to determine the ownership of the land and timber in question, and it was the duty of the Circuit Court to preserve the status quo of the same until the true ownership can *355 be determined by the proper judicial tribunal. Either party should be enjoined pending this determination.

The respondent had actual and constructive notice of appellant’s title. It is irreparable injury to take one’s property and put it into another’s possession. All of the facts in this case show that it is a case for the Court to interfere and grant injunction until the case can be tried on the merits. These exceptions are sustained; the other exceptions are not considered. The order of Judge Peurifoy- is reversed, and order of supersedeas granted by a Justice of this Court is continued.

Reversed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick, Fraser and Gage concur. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E. 131, 111 S.C. 353, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-salkehatchie-cypress-co-v-colleton-cypress-co-sc-1919.