Bichon v. State
Opinions
Appellant was given eight years in the penitentiary upon his conviction for sodomy.
The state introduced evidence which was positive, by a witness who was a policeman and who was directed to the room where appellant and his minor son were found engaged in the abominable conduct. Further discussion of the evidence will not be necessary.
[99] There are no exceptions to the court’s charge and we find nothing objectionable in it. Three bills of exception in the record are so qualified by the court that they would not, under any view, reflect error. We do not discuss these bills because they were filed too late and we are not permitted to do so under the statute.
We find no reversible error and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
230 S.W.2d 812 (Bichon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.