Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
534 U.S. 1155, 122 S. Ct. 1126, 151 L. Ed. 2d 1018, 70 U.S.L.W. 3517, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 856, 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1888
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 19, 2002·No. No. 01-874·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 534 U.S. 1155, 122 S. Ct. 1126, 151 L. Ed. 2d 1018, 70 U.S.L.W. 3517, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 856, 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1888 (2002).
534 U.S. 1155 (Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bostock v. Clayton County
590 U.S. 644 (Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Rodriguez
814 S.E.2d 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2018)
State v. Eddings
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
De Franceschi v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
477 F. App'x 200 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Hooks v. Branker
348 F. App'x 854 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
State v. Tomlin
670 S.E.2d 644 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Maniego
594 S.E.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble
246 F. Supp. 2d 301 (S.D. New York, 2003)
Medina Rene v. Mgm Grand Hotel, Inc.
305 F.3d 1061 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Norris v. Diakin Drivetrain Components
46 F. App'x 344 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)