Bezozo v. Town of Hempstead

259 A.D.2d 576, 686 N.Y.S.2d 489
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated October 30, 1997, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Birdies and Bogies, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff sustained personal injuries when he fell, while wearing spiked golf shoes, after walking into a cafeteria owned by the defendant Town of Hempstead and operated by the respondent Birdies and Bogies, Inc.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are no issues of fact regarding the absence of liability of the respondent Birdies and Bogies, Inc. There is no duty to warn against a condition that can readily be observed by those employing the reasonable use of their senses (see, Poerio v State of New York, 144 AD2d 129, 131). Under such circumstances, the condition is a warning in itself (see, Rolfe v Galt, 102 AD2d 983, 984). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bezozo v. Town of Hempstead, 259 A.D.2d 576, 686 N.Y.S.2d 489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 576 (Bezozo v. Town of Hempstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bezozo v. Town of Hempstead
259 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)