Bey v. Juwanna Mann Production Corp.
This text of 41 F. App'x 700 (Bey v. Juwanna Mann Production Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Shekhem Bey appeals the district court’s order denying the request to certify registration of an apparently fraudulent judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1963 (West Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bey v. Juwanna Mann Prod., No. CA-02-20-3-V (W.D.N.C. May 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F. App'x 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bey-v-juwanna-mann-production-corp-ca4-2002.