Bettis v. Metropolitan Correction Center

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 2022
Docket1:21-cv-07496
StatusUnknown

This text of Bettis v. Metropolitan Correction Center (Bettis v. Metropolitan Correction Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bettis v. Metropolitan Correction Center, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 1/13/2022 ZUBEARU BETTIS, Plaintiff, 1-21-CV-7496 (VEC) (KHP) -against- ORDER

METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; BUREAU OF PRISONS NORTH EAST REGION DIRECTOR; L. N’DIAYE, WARDEN METROPOLITAN CORR. CENTER, N.Y.; LT. PEREZ; FACILITY DIRECTOR MCC NY; DR. BEAUDOIN; WALKES, COUNSELOR MCC NY; BULLOCK, COUNSELOR MCC NY; JANE DOE, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT, Defendants. KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter, dated January 11, 2022, that explains that the U.S. Attorney’s Office identified the wrong Jane Doe Defendant, pursuant to the Honorable Valerie Caproni’s Valentin Order on October 4, 2021 (ECF No. 6.). Specifically, Plaintiff believes that the person identified — Yoon Kang — is not the correct person referenced in her Complaint because Yoon Kang was not at Metropolitan Correction Center New York on October 2, 2018 when Plaintiff was infected. Plaintiff provides a further description of the Jane Doe Defendant in her letter filed on the docket at ECF No. 22. As previously provided by Judge Caproni, under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). Plaintiff provides a further description of the misidentified Jane Doe Defendant in her letter filed on the docket at ECF No. 22. It is therefore ordered that the United States

Attorney’s Office, which is the attorney for and agent of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, endeavor to identify the identity and badge number of the Jane Doe Defendant whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the Defendant may be served. The United States Attorney’s Office is ordered to provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is requested to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is also directed mail a copy of this order and Plaintiff’s letter at ECF No. 22 to the United States Attorney's Office 86 Chambers Street / 3rd Floor New York City, NY 10007. Dated: January 13, 2022 New York, New York SO ORDERED. fa we ethane H Ferber KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bettis v. Metropolitan Correction Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bettis-v-metropolitan-correction-center-nysd-2022.