Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States

26 Ct. Int'l Trade 402, 2002 CIT 35
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedApril 2, 2002
DocketCourt 99-08-00524
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 402 (Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States, 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 402, 2002 CIT 35 (cit 2002).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

RlDGWAY, Judge:

Plaintiffs having filed a Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record challenging the determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) suspending an investigation into the alleged dumping in the United States of certain steel products from Brazil, published at Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation, Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from Brazil, 64 Fed. Reg. 38,792 (July 19, 1999); and further

The Court having granted Plaintiffs’ motion in part in Slip Op. 01-65, 25 CIT 519, 146 F. Supp. 2d 927 (2001), and, pursuant thereto, having remanded the matter to Commerce; and further

The Court having stayed its remand order at Defendant’s request, and with the consent of all parties, pending the outcome of the then-ongoing administrative review of the suspension agreement at issue; and further

Commerce now having published the final results of the administrative review terminating the suspension agreement, at Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Termination of the Suspension Agreement, Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Products From Brazil, 67 Fed. Reg. 6226 (Feb. 11, 2002); and further

The 30-day period for appeal of the termination of the suspension agreement having expired, with no appeal taken, so that the suspension agreement which was the subject of this action no longer has legal force or effect; and further

Plaintiffs having filed a Stipulation of Dismissal under U.S. CIT Rule 41(a)(1)(B), signed by all parties to the action;

Now, therefore, after due deliberation, it is

Ordered, adjudged and decreed that this case be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States
146 F. Supp. 2d 927 (Court of International Trade, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ct. Int'l Trade 402, 2002 CIT 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethlehem-steel-corp-v-united-states-cit-2002.