Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States

25 Ct. Int'l Trade 627, 155 F. Supp. 2d 707, 25 C.I.T. 627, 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1768, 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 124
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F. Supp. 2d 927
United States Court of International Trade·Decided June 7, 2001·No. Court No. 00-03-00116·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Carman, Chief Judge:

Upon consideration of the United States’ motion for Clarification and to Amend the Judgment, and upon the consent of Bethlehem Steel corporation andU.S. Steel Group, a unit of USX Corporation, and upon receiving no response from Pohang Iron & Steel Co., it is hereby

Ordered that the motion is granted, and it is further

Ordered that the judgment entered by the Court on April 4, 2001 is amended by striking from page 24 of Slip-Op. 01-38 the word “inher[628]*628ent” from before the word “characteristics” and by changing the phrase “51% of the financial benefits” on page 24 of Slip-Op. 01-38 to “51% of the discounts.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States, 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 627, 155 F. Supp. 2d 707, 25 C.I.T. 627, 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1768, 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 124 (cit 2001).

25 Ct. Int'l Trade 627 (Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.