Bethel v. Karas

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas
DecidedJune 26, 2019
Docket5:18-cv-05116
StatusUnknown

This text of Bethel v. Karas (Bethel v. Karas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bethel v. Karas, (W.D. Ark. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM CALVIN BETHEL, JR. PLAINTIFF

V. CASE NO. 5: 18-cv-05116

DR. ROBERT KARAS and SHERIFF TIM HELDER DEFENDANTS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff William C. Bethel, Jr., pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Bethel proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. The claims in this case concern the medical care Bethel received when he was incarcerated in the Washington County Detention Center (“WCDC”) from July 11, 2017, until his transfer to the Arkansas Department of Correction on October 19, 2017. Specifically, Bethel maintains that Dr. Robert Karas, the contract physician for the WCDC, and Sheriff Tim Helder violated Bethel’s constitutional rights by denying him adequate medical care. On December 19, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21). On December 27, 2018, an Order was entered directing Bethel to file a response to the Motion for Summary Judgment by January 17, 2019. (Doc. 24). Bethel was advised in the Order that failure to comply with its terms would result in: (a) all of the facts set forth by the Defendants in the summary judgment papers being deemed admitted by Bethel, pursuant to Rule 56.1(c) of the Local Rules for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas; and/or (b) the dismissal of the entire case, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Bethel did not file a response to the summary judgment motion. 1 Although the local rules allow the Court to deem facts admitted when a plaintiff does not file a response specifically disputing those facts, the Eighth Circuit has stated: A plaintiff’s verified complaint is the equivalent of an affidavit for purposes of summary judgment, and a complaint signed and dated as true under penalty of perjury satisfies the requirement of a verified complaint, 28 U.S.C. § 1746. Although a party may not generally rest on his pleadings to create a fact issue sufficient to survive summary judgment, the facts alleged in a verified complaint need not be repeated in a responsive affidavit in order to survive a summary judgment motion.

Roberson v. Hayti Police Dep’t., 241 F.3d 992, 994-995 (8th Cir. 2001). Therefore, the Court will “piece[] together [Bethel’s] version of the facts from the verified complaint.” McClanahan v. Young, 2016 WL 520983, at *1 (D.S.D. Feb. 5, 2016). The Court also has the benefit of Bethel’s deposition, which is attached to the motion. Accordingly, the Court will deem admitted those portions of the Defendants’ statement of material facts that do not conflict with either Bethel’s verified complaint or his deposition. I. BACKGROUND A. Bethel’s Account of His Medical History Bethel testified that he was diagnosed in 2015 with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”) and sleep apnea by Dr. Kalyan of Northwest Physicians. (Doc. 23-6 at 25, 27). Dr. Kalyan prescribed oxygen, twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week; the use of a CPAP/BIPAP1 machine; Prednisone2 as needed; two inhalers

1 CPAP stands for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. BIPAP stands for Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure.

2 “Prednisone is used alone or with other medications to treat the symptoms of low corticosteroid levels (lack of certain substances that are usually produced by the body and are needed for normal body functioning). Prednisone is also used to treat other 2 (Symbicort and Coventolin); an Albuterol updraft machine; and an Albuterol inhaler.3 Id. at 25, 27, 32-33. Bethel stated that he did not use the oxygen as directed because he was worried he would become dependent on oxygen. Id. at 25. When Bethel’s deposition was taken on November 12, 2018, he testified that he only used oxygen on an as-needed basis, which he estimated was now more than 50% of the time. Id. at 26. He indicated that he possessed a portable oxygen bottle in a carrying case with a nasal cannula. Id. Bethel also testified that he used the CPAP/BIPAP machine when he slept. Id. at 27. He admitted that there were periods of time in his life when he could not afford to lease the CPAP machine. Id. at 27-28. Further, despite his COPD diagnosis, Bethel testified that he still smoked about a pack of cigarettes a day. Id. at 49. At some point, Bethel was diagnosed with a blood clot (a deep vein thrombosis (“DVT”)) in his right leg and was placed on Coumadin.4 Id. He claims that Dr. Hayward

conditions in patients with normal corticosteroid levels. These conditions include certain types of arthritis; severe allergic reactions; multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the nerves do not function properly); lupus (a disease in which the body attacks many of its own organs); and certain conditions that affect the lungs, skin, eyes, kidneys blood, thyroid, stomach, and intestines.” https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601102.html (accessed April 23, 2019).

3 Bethel testified that an updraft is a machine in which you put a liquid medication and then you inhale until the liquid is gone. (Doc. 23-6 at 34). Typically, this process takes twenty minutes. Id.at 37. He currently uses updrafts four times a day and the Albuterol inhaler about every hour and a half. Id. at 36-37. He uses the steroid inhaler about twice a day. Id.

4 Coumadin is a brand name for Warfarin. “Warfarin is used to prevent blood clots from forming or growing larger in your blood and blood vessels. It is prescribed for people with certain types of irregular heartbeat, people with prosthetic (replacement or mechanical) heart valves, and people who have suffered a heart attack. Warfarin is also used to treat or prevent venous thrombosis (swelling and blood clot in a vein) and pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lung).” https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682277.html (accessed April 21, 2019).

3 of Highlands Oncology took him off Coumadin due to an adverse reaction and prescribed Lovenox5 injections instead. Bethel testified that he currently gives himself Lovenox injections in the stomach. Id. at 38-39. He maintains that in 2017, he was also diagnosed as having pulmonary embolisms in his lungs, specifically three or four blood clots. Id. at 38, 41. Next, Bethel claims that he was diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension in 2010. This condition was not treated. Id. at 43. He testified that his bicuspid valve and his mitral valve have moderate leakage. Id. at 43-44. He further claims that he was diagnosed with hypertension at some point in time, and doctors treated that condition with blood pressure medication. Id. at 43. Next, Bethel claimed to have “borderline diabetes,” which he claims to monitor himself by testing his sugar levels daily. He also testified that he has neuropathy6 in his

5 Lovenox is a brand name for an enoxaparin injection. “Enoxaparin is used to prevent blood clots in the leg in patients who are on bedrest or who are having hip replacement, knee replacement, or stomach surgery. It is used in combination with aspirin to prevent complications from angina (chest pain) and heart attacks. It is also used in combination with warfarin to treat blood clots in the leg.” https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601210.html (accessed April 21, 2019).

6 Neuropathy is defined as a term for: “any disorder affecting any segment of the nervous system.” https://www.medilexicon.com/dictionary/60187 (accessed April 23, 2019).

4 legs and hands and at one point was prescribed “nerve medication,” i.e., Gabapentin7 or Klonopin. 8 Id. at 44-45.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estelle v. Gamble
429 U.S. 97 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
436 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Ricci v. DeStefano
557 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Schaub v. VonWald
638 F.3d 905 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Torgerson v. City of Rochester
643 F.3d 1031 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Teresa Wagner v. Carolyn Jones
664 F.3d 259 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Floyd L. Roberson v. Bill Bradshaw
198 F.3d 645 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Kahle v. Leonard
477 F.3d 544 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Norman Carpenter v. Deputy Harold Gage
686 F.3d 644 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
530 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.
269 F. Supp. 3d 444 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bethel v. Karas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethel-v-karas-arwd-2019.