Betheil-Spitz v. Linares

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Betheil-Spitz v. Linares

276 A.D.2d 732, 715 N.Y.S.2d 338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 732 (Betheil-Spitz v. Linares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Betheil-Spitz v. Linares, 276 A.D.2d 732, 715 N.Y.S.2d 338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by the respondents on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 15, 1999, to dismiss the appeal as academic in light of a decision and order of the same court dated October 28, 1999. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 10, 2000, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic in light of our determination of the appeal. Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the respondents on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 15, 1999, to dismiss the appeal as academic in light of a decision and order of the same court dated October 28, 1999. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 10, 2000, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic in light of our determination of the appeal. Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 732, 715 N.Y.S.2d 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betheil-spitz-v-linares-nyappdiv-2000.