Bethea v. Department of Labor

Fourth Circuit

Bethea v. Department of Labor

295 F. App'x 555

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2008·No. No. 08-1290·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Bethea seeks review of the Administrative Review Board’s decision and order dismissing his complaint of retaliatory discharge filed pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 2007 & Supp.2008). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Bethea v. Wallace Trucking Co., No. 07-057 (A.R.B. Dec. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [556]*556legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Bethea seeks review of the Administrative Review Board’s decision and order dismissing his complaint of retaliatory discharge filed pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 2007 & Supp.2008). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Bethea v. Wallace Trucking Co., No. 07-057 (A.R.B. Dec. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [556]*556legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Bethea v. Department of Labor, 295 F. App'x 555 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

295 F. App'x 555 (Bethea v. Department of Labor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related