Betenbaugh v. Princeton Hospital
This text of 235 A.2d 889 (Betenbaugh v. Princeton Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HELEN L. BETENBAUGH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
PRINCETON HOSPITAL, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ELLWOOD W. GODFREY AND R.J. BELFORD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*393 Mr. John A. Willette for appellant, Princeton Hospital, (Messrs. Williams & Willette, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel K. VanDorn for appellant, Ellwood W. Godfrey, (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Mr. Victor C. Hansen, of counsel).
Mr. Robert J.C. McCoid for appellant, R.J. Belford (Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, attorneys).
Mr. Leonard J. Felzenberg for respondents (Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch & Felzenberg, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reason expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, GOLDMANN, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.2d 889, 50 N.J. 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betenbaugh-v-princeton-hospital-nj-1967.