Betances v. The City Commissioner of NYC Corrections
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADONIS BETANCES, Plaintiff, 24-CV-2596 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE CITY COMMISSIONER OF NYC CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated April 29, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted and declines supplemental jurisdiction of Plaintiff's state law claims The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Judgment shall enter. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2024 New York, New York /S/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Betances v. The City Commissioner of NYC Corrections (Betances v. The City Commissioner of NYC Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.