Bestfoods v. United States

57 F. Supp. 2d 1200, 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 452, 23 C.I.T. 452, 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 54
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bestfoods v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 F. Supp. 2d 965
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 15, 1999·No. Slip Op. 99-64; Court 95-02-00144·Published

Opinion

Judgment

WATSON, Senior Judge.

This court’s judgment for defendant entered pursuant to CPC Int'l. v. United States, 971 F.Supp. 574 (CIT 1997), having been cross-appealed by the parties, reversed favorably to defendant cross-appellant, vacated, and the action remanded to permit Bestfoods to pursue any further arguments it might have, Bestfoods (formerly known as CPC International, Inc.) v. United States, 165 F.3d 1371 (Fed.Cir.1999) (issued as a mandate on March 18, 1999); and

This action, previously assigned to the Senior Judge Bernard Newman, having been reassigned to the undersigned on the 26th day of May 1999, and

No further arguments having been submitted by counsel for plaintiff to this court pursuant to the remand, and no further action having been taken by either party in this case;

As the prior judgment for defendant, premised on the court’s conclusion that marking would be required under the pre-NAFTA “substantial transformation” test was vacated on appeal, it hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action be, and hereby, is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bestfoods v. United States, 57 F. Supp. 2d 1200, 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 452, 23 C.I.T. 452, 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 54 (cit 1999).

57 F. Supp. 2d 1200 (Bestfoods v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CPC International, Inc. v. United States
971 F. Supp. 574 (Court of International Trade, 1997)