Bestfoods v. United States
This text of 57 F. Supp. 2d 1200 (Bestfoods v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment
This court’s judgment for defendant entered pursuant to CPC Int'l. v. United States, 971 F.Supp. 574 (CIT 1997), having been cross-appealed by the parties, reversed favorably to defendant cross-appellant, vacated, and the action remanded to permit Bestfoods to pursue any further arguments it might have, Bestfoods (formerly known as CPC International, Inc.) v. United States, 165 F.3d 1371 (Fed.Cir.1999) (issued as a mandate on March 18, 1999); and
This action, previously assigned to the Senior Judge Bernard Newman, having been reassigned to the undersigned on the 26th day of May 1999, and
No further arguments having been submitted by counsel for plaintiff to this court pursuant to the remand, and no further action having been taken by either party in this case;
As the prior judgment for defendant, premised on the court’s conclusion that marking would be required under the pre-NAFTA “substantial transformation” test was vacated on appeal, it hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action be, and hereby, is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F. Supp. 2d 1200, 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 452, 23 C.I.T. 452, 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bestfoods-v-united-states-cit-1999.