Best v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

278 A.D.2d 350, 718 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13275
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated August 5, 1999, which denied their motion, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion which was determined by an order of the same court dated March 24, 1999.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs’ motion was not based upon new evidence which was unavailable at the time of the original motion. Thus, it was actually a motion for reargument (see, Citibank v Olson, 204 AD2d 381; Chiarella v Quitoni, 178 AD2d 502). The appeal must therefore be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Schumer v Levine, 208 AD2d 605, 606). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Best v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 278 A.D.2d 350, 718 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 350 (Best v. Sears Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Best v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
278 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)