Best Buy Warehouse v. Best Buy Company, Inc.
This text of 920 F.2d 536 (Best Buy Warehouse v. Best Buy Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a trademark-infringement case. The plaintiff operates under the names “Best Buy Warehouse,” “Best Buy Office Furniture,” and “Best Buy Office Warehouse.” The defendant operates under the names “Best Buy Company” and “Best Buy Superstores.” The question presented is whether the plaintiff has a legally pro-tectable interest in the use of the words “best buy.”
The District Court1 held that the phrase “best buy” is generic as a matter of law, and therefore not the subject of trademark protection. It granted summary judgment for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.
We affirm. In our view, the opinion of the District Court is fully sufficient in its discussion of the legal issues in this case, and we affirm the judgment of that court on the basis of its opinion. 751 F.Supp. 824. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
920 F.2d 536, 1990 WL 191491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/best-buy-warehouse-v-best-buy-company-inc-ca8-1991.