Home/Supreme Court of Oklahoma/Besecker v. Chilbert

Besecker v. Chilbert

1994 OK 125, 887 P.2d 1286, 65 O.B.A.J. 3833, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 147, 1994 WL 642713
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 10, 1994
DocketNo. 84323
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1994 OK 125 (Besecker v. Chilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Besecker v. Chilbert, 1994 OK 125, 887 P.2d 1286, 65 O.B.A.J. 3833, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 147, 1994 WL 642713 (Okla. 1994).

Opinions

ORDER

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied. This appeal was timely commenced within 30 days of the filing of an order prepared in conformance with 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.3, 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 990A. The trial court’s March 1 ruling was not prepared in conformance with 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.3, Mansell v. City of Lawton, 877 P.2d 1120 (Okl.1994).

HODGES, C.J., LAVENDER, V.C.J., and ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur. SIMMS, HARGRAVE and OPALA, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles Sanders Homes, Inc. v. Cook & Associates, Engineering, Inc.
2016 OK CIV APP 45 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 OK 125, 887 P.2d 1286, 65 O.B.A.J. 3833, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 147, 1994 WL 642713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/besecker-v-chilbert-okla-1994.