Berzon v. Oriole Homes Corporation
This text of 497 So. 2d 670 (Berzon v. Oriole Homes Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Renee BERZON, Appellant,
v.
ORIOLE HOMES CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*671 Jeffrey H. Rosenthal of Resnick & Rosenthal, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
G. Michael Keenan of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand on the authority of Appalachian, Inc. v. Olson, 468 So.2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 482 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1985); and Dorchester Development, Inc. v. Burk, 439 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We agree with the reasoning of these cases which hold that the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act does apply to condominium sales, and that a developer may not claim an exemption under the act when damages for violation of a two (2) year construction provision are limited to the return of deposit or specific performance.
ANSTEAD, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 So. 2d 670, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berzon-v-oriole-homes-corporation-fladistctapp-1986.