Home/Oregon Supreme Court/Bertram v. Malheur County

Bertram v. Malheur County

143 P.3d 544, 341 Or. 392, 2006 Ore. LEXIS 888
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 19, 2006
DocketS53511
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 143 P.3d 544 (Bertram v. Malheur County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bertram v. Malheur County, 143 P.3d 544, 341 Or. 392, 2006 Ore. LEXIS 888 (Or. 2006).

Opinion

143 P.3d 544 (2006)
341 Or. 392

BERTRAM v. MALHEUR COUNTY.

No. S53511.

OREGON SUPREME COURT.

September 19, 2006.

Petition for review allowed.

Defendant's petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the appeal is dismissed. The case is remanded to the Malheur County Circuit Court with instructions to vacate the judgment, leaving in place the intermediate order that reflects the disposition of a portion of plaintiffs' claim. See Lesch v. DeWitt, 317 Or. 585, 589-90, 858 P.2d 872 (1993) (ORCP 67 B judgment is not final and appealable when it disposes only of portion of claim rather than fully adjudicating entire claim); Dept. of Rev. v. Universal Foods Corp., 311 Or. 537, 544-49, 815 P.2d 1237 (1991) (when one of two theories supporting one legal right is not adjudicated, claim is not finally determined and is not appealable); and May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, 297 Or. 525, 530-531, 686 P.2d 1015 (1984) (ORCP 67 B gives no discretion to treat as final that which is only partial adjudication of interests of party or adjudication of fewer than all grounds alleged in support of single claim).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wiltse
Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023
State v. B. C.
496 P.3d 1154 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
State v. Curry
461 P.3d 1106 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)
State v. Ellis
328 P.3d 720 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
State v. Murr
295 P.3d 122 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)
State v. Anderson
228 P.3d 638 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
State v. Mendoza
228 P.3d 635 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
State v. Cunningham
221 P.3d 165 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Steele v. Mayoral
220 P.3d 761 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
State v. Myers
202 P.3d 238 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Vance v. Teplick
183 P.3d 229 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Dominguez-Coronado
182 P.3d 322 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Purdom
180 P.3d 150 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Marroquin
168 P.3d 1246 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Fraker v. Benton County Sheriff's Office
166 P.3d 1137 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Tatarinov
155 P.3d 67 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Mendoza-Lazaro
155 P.3d 63 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
In re M.P.
220 S.W.3d 99 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Peed v. Hill
153 P.3d 125 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
in the Matter of M.P., a Child
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 P.3d 544, 341 Or. 392, 2006 Ore. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bertram-v-malheur-county-or-2006.