Bert M. Colbert v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, No. 30464 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)

439 F.2d 1130
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 1971
Docket1130
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 F.2d 1130 (Bert M. Colbert v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, No. 30464 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bert M. Colbert v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, No. 30464 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970), 439 F.2d 1130 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

439 F.2d 1130

Bert M. COLBERT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 30464 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 431 F.2d 409, Part
I (5th Cir. 1970).

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 8, 1971.

Bert M. Colbert, pro se.

Crawfore C. Martin, Atty. Gen., Robert Darden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

Colbert, a Texas state prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his motion to secure his state court transcripts and records. We affirm.

The records the appellant has sought to obtain include the police arrest and booking sheets, a search warrant, and the transcripts of his arraignment proceedings relative to his state convictions for possession of marijuana and heroin. Though he has no appeal or petition for post-conviction relief pending at this time, the appellant contends that he is entitled to free copies of the material because he lacks the funds to purchase them.

Under ordinary circumstances such as these, an indigent does not have a federally-protected right to a free copy of his transcript or other court records merely to search for possible error in order to file a petition for collateral relief at some future date. Bennett v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 437 F.2d 1210; Skinner v. United States, 5th Cir. 1970, 434 F.2d 1036.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dedorise Daniel Doyal v. United States
456 F.2d 1292 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 F.2d 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bert-m-colbert-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1971.