Berry v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Berry v. State

113 So. 626, 22 Ala. App. 168, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 116

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 7, 1927

Docket8 Div. 541.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 So. 626 (Berry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berry v. State, 113 So. 626, 22 Ala. App. 168, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 116 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of burglary. The corpus delicti was proven. There was evidence tending to prove that defendant was in possession of some of the goods stolen from the store at the time of the burglary. There was an effort on the part of defendant to explain this possession. This was a jury question.

We find no prejudicial error in the rulings of the court or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of burglary. The corpus delicti was proven. There was evidence tending to prove that defendant was in possession of some of the goods stolen from the store at the time of the burglary. There was an effort on the part of defendant to explain this possession. This was a jury question.

We find no prejudicial error in the rulings of the court or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 626, 22 Ala. App. 168, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-state-alactapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack