Berry v. State

110 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ala. App. 102
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1926·No. 6 Div. 48.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, which charged him with a violation of the prohibition law. He was tried by the court without a jury, and was convicted. The court sentenced the defendant to hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction he appeals, and here insists that the ’court erred in its rulings upon the admission of evidence, and also in its rendition of the judgment of guilt. There is no merit whatever in either of these insistences. The rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence were correct, and the evidence was sufficient to justify the court in the conviction of the defendant. The judgment of conviction will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. State, 110 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 661 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

110 So. 917 (Berry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.