Berry v. State

110 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 661
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 14, 1926
Docket6 Div. 48.
StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 917 (Berry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. State, 110 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 661 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, which charged him with a violation of the prohibition law. He was tried by the court without a jury, and was convicted. The court sentenced the defendant to hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction he appeals, and here insists that the ’court erred in its rulings upon the admission of evidence, and also in its rendition of the judgment of guilt. There is no merit whatever in either of these insistences. The rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence were correct, and the evidence was sufficient to justify the court in the conviction of the defendant. The judgment of conviction will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-state-alactapp-1926.