Berry-Fortune Construction Co. v. Bacon

203 N.C. 1
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 203 N.C. 1 (Berry-Fortune Construction Co. v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry-Fortune Construction Co. v. Bacon, 203 N.C. 1 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks to enforce a derivative right, but its evidence falls short of proving the basic contract as alleged between defendant and the Tryon Development Company. Gorrell v. Water Co., 124 N. C., 328, 32 S. E., 720; 6 R. C. L., 886. For this reason, the judgment of nonsuit is correct.

But going further, it would seem that the defendant’s plea of res judicata is also well founded. Distributing Co. v. Carraway, 196 N. C., 58, 144 S. E., 535.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Distributing Co. v. Carraway
144 S.E. 535 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.
46 L.R.A. 513 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.C. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-fortune-construction-co-v-bacon-nc-1932.