Berninger v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK
603 A.2d 946, 127 N.J. 226, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 18
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 254 N.J.Super. 401, 603 A.2d 954 (1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berninger v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK, 603 A.2d 946, 127 N.J. 226, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 18 (N.J. 1992).
603 A.2d 946 (Berninger v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Darst v. BLAIRSTOWN TP. ZONING
982 A.2d 27 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2009)
Pond Run Watershed Ass'n v. Tp. of Hamilton Zoning Bd.
937 A.2d 334 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2008)
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Board of Adjustment
744 A.2d 1169 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)
Meridian Hospitals v. Point Pleasant
739 A.2d 999 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
Southport Dev. Group, Inc. v. TP. OF WALL
685 A.2d 84 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Aldrich v. Schwartz
609 A.2d 507 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Berninger v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK
603 A.2d 946 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992)