Bernard v. State

651 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2491, 1995 WL 104508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bernard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 659 So. 2d 1346
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 1995·No. No. 94-112·Published

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Appellant challenges the final judgment and sentence based on convictions for sexual battery and lewd and lascivious assault. Appellant raises a number of issues, only one of which has merit. Appellant’s conviction and sentence for lewd and lascivious conduct must be reversed where the conduct which resulted in conviction arose out of the same act for which appellant was convicted of sexual battery. Convictions for both charges based on the same act are impermissible. State v. Hightower, 509 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1987); see also McConn v. State, 648 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). As in McConn, the ongoing sexual assault in this case cannot be broken into two sequential crimes.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard v. State, 651 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2491, 1995 WL 104508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 817 (Bernard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McConn v. State
648 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Hightower
509 So. 2d 1078 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)