Bernard v. State

651 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2491, 1995 WL 104508
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1995
DocketNo. 94-112
StatusPublished

This text of 651 So. 2d 817 (Bernard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernard v. State, 651 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2491, 1995 WL 104508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Appellant challenges the final judgment and sentence based on convictions for sexual battery and lewd and lascivious assault. Appellant raises a number of issues, only one of which has merit. Appellant’s conviction and sentence for lewd and lascivious conduct must be reversed where the conduct which resulted in conviction arose out of the same act for which appellant was convicted of sexual battery. Convictions for both charges based on the same act are impermissible. State v. Hightower, 509 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1987); see also McConn v. State, 648 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). As in McConn, the ongoing sexual assault in this case cannot be broken into two sequential crimes.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McConn v. State
648 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Hightower
509 So. 2d 1078 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2491, 1995 WL 104508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.