Bernard v. State
This text of 651 So. 2d 817 (Bernard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges the final judgment and sentence based on convictions for sexual battery and lewd and lascivious assault. Appellant raises a number of issues, only one of which has merit. Appellant’s conviction and sentence for lewd and lascivious conduct must be reversed where the conduct which resulted in conviction arose out of the same act for which appellant was convicted of sexual battery. Convictions for both charges based on the same act are impermissible. State v. Hightower, 509 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1987); see also McConn v. State, 648 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). As in McConn, the ongoing sexual assault in this case cannot be broken into two sequential crimes.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2491, 1995 WL 104508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.