Bernard E. Berton, Jr. v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections
Opinion
288 U.S.App.D.C. 256
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Bernard E. BERTON, Jr., Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
No. 90-7006.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 25, 1991.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, and the court's November 21, 1990, order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the show cause order be discharged. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum and order filed November 30, 1989. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
925 F.2d 487 (Bernard E. Berton, Jr. v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.