Bernal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bernal v. State

768 So. 2d 467, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6653, 2000 WL 709150

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 2, 2000

DocketNo. 2D99-3361

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 768 So. 2d 467 (Bernal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernal v. State, 768 So. 2d 467, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6653, 2000 WL 709150 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Jose Bernal appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s order without discussion. However, to the extent that Bernal raises claims of trial court error or improper actions by the state attorney that were preserved for appellate review, but not raised on direct appeal, our affirmance is without prejudice to Bernal now raising them in a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j). This court will consider as timely filed any such petition filed within 30 days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See, e.g., Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563 [468]*468(Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Ashby v. State, 752 So.2d 698 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Juan Jose Bernal appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s order without discussion. However, to the extent that Bernal raises claims of trial court error or improper actions by the state attorney that were preserved for appellate review, but not raised on direct appeal, our affirmance is without prejudice to Bernal now raising them in a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j). This court will consider as timely filed any such petition filed within 30 days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See, e.g., Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563 [468]*468(Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Ashby v. State, 752 So.2d 698 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 So. 2d 467, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6653, 2000 WL 709150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernal-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack