Bernal v. State

741 So. 2d 585, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11618, 1999 WL 651978
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bernal v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6653
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 1999·No. No. 99-02200·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Jesus Bernal appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Although we cannot agree with the trial court’s apparent conclusion that Bernal’s claim is refuted by the record attachments, we nonetheless affirm the denial because we find that rule 3.800 is not. the proper vehicle for Bernal to use to make this challenge to his sen[586]*586tence. See, e.g., State v. Mancino, 705 So.2d 1379 (Fla.1998). Our affirmance is, however, without prejudice to Bernal raising the same claim in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, provided, of course, that he is not otherwise procedurally barred from doing so.

FULMER, A.C.J., and GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernal v. State, 741 So. 2d 585, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11618, 1999 WL 651978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

741 So. 2d 585 (Bernal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mancino
705 So. 2d 1379 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)