Bermudes Abreu v. ExcelAire Services, Inc.
This text of 493 F. Supp. 2d 1374 (Bermudes Abreu v. ExcelAire Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TRANSFER ORDER
This litigation currently consists of six actions, two actions pending in the Northern District of New York, and one action each pending in the Central District of California, the Middle District of Florida, the Eastern District of Missouri and the Southern District of New York.1 Before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, brought by plaintiff in the Southern District of New York action for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of these actions. All responding parties support centralization. Movant and plaintiffs in the Central District of California and the Middle District of Florida actions and one of the Southern District of Florida potentially related actions suggest centralization in the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiffs in the two Eastern District of New York actions and all defendants favor selection of the Eastern District of New York as the transferee forum.
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that these six actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Sec[1376]*1376tion 1407 in the Eastern District of New York will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. All actions concern the cause or causes of a mid-air collision of an aircraft operated by Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes, S.A. (Gol) with a business jet and the subsequent crash of the Gol aircraft near Peixoto de Azeveda, Brazil, on September 29, 2006. Centralization under Section 1407 is necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.
We are persuaded that the Eastern District of New York is an appropriate transferee forum for this docket. The first two filed actions are pending in this district, and they are more procedurally advanced than the actions pending elsewhere.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions pending outside the Eastern District of New York are transferred to the Eastern District of New York and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 F. Supp. 2d 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bermudes-abreu-v-excelaire-services-inc-jpml-2007.