Berger v. Berger
463 So. 2d 427, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 324, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berger v. Berger. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 803 →
Opinion
We have considered the four points assigned as error and find that the procedural errors complained of were not material or were not adequately preserved for review. On the issues of alimony and distribution of the marital property no abuse of discretion has been clearly demonstrated. See Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berger v. Berger, 463 So. 2d 427, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 324, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12246 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
463 So. 2d 427 (Berger v. Berger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)