Berger v. Berger
This text of 463 So. 2d 427 (Berger v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have considered the four points assigned as error and find that the procedural errors complained of were not material or were not adequately preserved for review. On the issues of alimony and distribution of the marital property no abuse of discretion has been clearly demonstrated. See Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 So. 2d 427, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 324, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-berger-fladistctapp-1985.