Bergara v. Chafin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2007·No. 07-6314·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6314

MARJIL LEE BERGARA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

A. BENTON CHAFIN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (7:07-cv-00061-jpj)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marjil Lee Bergara, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marjil Lee Bergara appeals the district court’s order

dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bergara

v. Chafin, No. 7:07-cv-00061-jpj (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bergara v. Chafin, (4th Cir. 2007).

Bergara v. Chafin (Bergara v. Chafin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related