Bergara v. Chafin

Fourth Circuit

Bergara v. Chafin

239 F. App'x 783

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2007·No. No. 07-6314·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marjil Lee Bergara appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See [784]*784Bergara v. Chafin, No. 7:07-cv-00061-jpj, 2007 WL 549114 (W.D.Va. Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Marjil Lee Bergara appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See [784]*784Bergara v. Chafin, No. 7:07-cv-00061-jpj, 2007 WL 549114 (W.D.Va. Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Bergara v. Chafin, 239 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

239 F. App'x 783 (Bergara v. Chafin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related