Berg v. State of RI

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

February 8, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

No. 94-1984 

                                   JANICE M. BERG,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                            STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Janice M. Berg on brief pro se.
            ______________

____________________

____________________



Per Curiam.   Plaintiff's action essentially sought
                      __________

            federal  court  review  of  state  family  court proceedings.

            Because  lower federal courts  do not  have the  authority to

            review  such   proceedings,  we   affirm  the  dismissal   of

            plaintiff's action.  Rooker  v. Fidelity Trust Co.,  263 U.S.
                                 _____________________________

            413, 415-16 (1923);  Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st
                                 __________________

            Cir. 1990).  

                      Affirmed.
                      ________