Berg v. State of RI
This text of Berg v. State of RI (Berg v. State of RI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Berg v. State of RI, (1st Cir. 1995).
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
February 8, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1984
JANICE M. BERG,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Janice M. Berg on brief pro se. ______________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. Plaintiff's action essentially sought __________
federal court review of state family court proceedings.
Because lower federal courts do not have the authority to
review such proceedings, we affirm the dismissal of
plaintiff's action. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. _____________________________
413, 415-16 (1923); Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st __________________
Cir. 1990).
Affirmed. ________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alfred Lancellotti v. Honorable Thomas F. Fay, Etc.
909 F.2d 15 (First Circuit, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Berg v. State of RI, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berg-v-state-of-ri-ca1-1995.