Berg v. Richmond Unified School District

572 F.2d 709, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8287
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 31, 1978·No. No. 74-1457·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,* District Judge.

The judgment of the district court is vacated. This case is remanded for further proceedings which should be sufficient to enable the court:

1. To give reconsideration to the sick-pay issue in light of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125, 97 S.Ct. 401, 50 L.Ed.2d 343 (1976), and Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, 434 U.S. 136, 98 S.Ct. 347, 54 L.Ed.2d 356 (1977), including consideration of the question (if it be advanced by Berg) whether the district’s policy disallowing sick pay was a pretext for discrimination.

2. To give consideration to the question whether the issue relating to the school district’s interim maternity leave policy has been rendered moot by intervening legislation.

3. To resolve any issues not yet reached by the court, including appellee’s paternity leave claim and claim against Dr. Snod-grass.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berg v. Richmond Unified School District, 572 F.2d 709, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8287 (9th Cir. 1978).

572 F.2d 709 (Berg v. Richmond Unified School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berg v. Richmond Unified School District
572 F.2d 709 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)