Benton v. David Berg Distilling Co.
This text of 63 Pa. Super. 412 (Benton v. David Berg Distilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The questions presented by this appeal were correctly determined by the lower court and we cannot add anything profitable to the reasons given in support of them in the opinion of the learned president- judge of the Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County. We might suggest that in addition to the authority quoted by Judge Martin, concerning the constitutionality of the section in question, that it was before this court in Heist v. Montayne (No. 1), 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 611, where Judge Porter- holds that this section does not offend Section ■7, Article III, of the Constitution of 1874.
Judgment affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Pa. Super. 412, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benton-v-david-berg-distilling-co-pasuperct-1916.