Benson ex rel. Patterson v. Patterson

787 A.2d 971

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Benson ex rel. Patterson v. Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 574 Pa. 346 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 10, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2002, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:

1. May a minor child seek continued support from the estate of the child’s deceased parent?

2. Should the amount of child support to be paid by the estate of a child’s deceased parent be determined in accordance with the support guidelines?

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2002, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:

1. May a minor child seek continued support from the estate of the child’s deceased parent?

2. Should the amount of child support to be paid by the estate of a child’s deceased parent be determined in accordance with the support guidelines?

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Benson ex rel. Patterson v. Patterson, 787 A.2d 971 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

787 A.2d 971 (Benson ex rel. Patterson v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.