Bennett v. United States

385 U.S. 4, 17 L. Ed. 2d 4, 87 S. Ct. 39, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 545
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. 143·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In light of the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the papers filed in this case, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Claims is vacated and the case is remanded to that court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. United States, 385 U.S. 4, 17 L. Ed. 2d 4, 87 S. Ct. 39, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 545 (1966).

385 U.S. 4 (Bennett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

(HC) Ramirez v. Pfeiffer
E.D. California, 2019
Tierney v. Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City
742 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1987)
Schweig v. Maryland Plaza Redevelopment Corp.
676 S.W.2d 249 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)
Thomas W. Garland, Inc. v. City of St. Louis
492 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Missouri, 1980)
Maryland Plaza Redevelopment Corp. v. Greenberg
594 S.W.2d 284 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Young v. Harris
599 F.2d 870 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
Schweig v. City of St. Louis
569 S.W.2d 215 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Planned Industrial Expansion Authority
517 S.W.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1975)
Claude F. Salter v. The United States
412 F.2d 874 (Court of Claims, 1969)
Jordan v. Village of Menomonee Falls
385 U.S. 4 (Supreme Court, 1966)