Bennett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bennett v. State

813 S.W.2d 89, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 997, 1991 WL 110942

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1022 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 1991·No. No. 59272·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Angela Bennett, pleaded guilty to stealing, a class C felony, and was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016, RSMo, (1986) to a twelve year term of imprisonment, concurrent with a separate five year term.

Movant then brought a Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. She appeals from the denial of that motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Angela Bennett, pleaded guilty to stealing, a class C felony, and was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016, RSMo, (1986) to a twelve year term of imprisonment, concurrent with a separate five year term.

Movant then brought a Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. She appeals from the denial of that motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Bennett v. State, 813 S.W.2d 89, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 997, 1991 WL 110942 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

813 S.W.2d 89 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.