Bennett v. State

850 S.W.2d 438, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 580, 1993 WL 118516
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 20, 1993
DocketNo. 61885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 850 S.W.2d 438 (Bennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. State, 850 S.W.2d 438, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 580, 1993 WL 118516 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.-15(j). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission v. Greenwood
269 S.W.3d 449 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
850 S.W.2d 438, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 580, 1993 WL 118516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-state-moctapp-1993.