Bennett v. State

850 S.W.2d 438, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 580, 1993 WL 118516
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 1993·No. No. 61885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.-15(j). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. State, 850 S.W.2d 438, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 580, 1993 WL 118516 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

850 S.W.2d 438 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission v. Greenwood
269 S.W.3d 449 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)