Bennett v. State
932 So. 2d 221, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8142, 2005 WL 1279144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 So. 2d 1251 →
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/MOTION TO CERTIFY CONFLICT
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, but grant the motion to certify conflict. As to our reliance on Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), we again certify conflict with McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. State, 932 So. 2d 221, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8142, 2005 WL 1279144 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
932 So. 2d 221 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)