Bennett v. State
905 So. 2d 1038, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10511, 2005 WL 1584966
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2005·No. No. 5D05-1468·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Bennett appeals from the circuit court’s summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking post-conviction relief. We affirm because it is clear Bennett’s rule 3.850 motion was untimely. It was filed more than two years after his judgment and sentence became final. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 8.850(b). Bennett failed to allege any exceptions to the time limitations provided in the rule.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. State, 905 So. 2d 1038, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10511, 2005 WL 1584966 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
905 So. 2d 1038 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PROGRESSIVE AUTO PRO INSURANCE COMPANY v. Wynne Chiropractic, Inc.
905 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)