Bennett v. State

701 So. 2d 352, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7206, 1997 WL 345854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 684 So. 2d 242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1997·No. No. 96-3507·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant complains that he was entitled to credit for time previously served on probation against the probationary portion of the new split sentence he received following revocation of probation; that a written order should have been entered revoking his probation; and that the trial court should not have increased the probationary portion of the split sentence from three to five years on resentencing following remand from this court. We vacate appellant’s sentence, and remand with directions that the trial court give appellant credit for time previously spent on probation to the extent necessary to keep the total sentence within the statutory maximum for the offense for which appellant was convicted. Waters v. State, 662 So.2d 332 (Fla.1995). Also on remand, we direct the trial court to enter an appropriate written order revoking appellant’s probation. Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). As to appellant’s final issue, we affirm without discussion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. State, 701 So. 2d 352, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7206, 1997 WL 345854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 352 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
638 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Waters v. State
662 So. 2d 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)