Bennett v. State

664 So. 2d 70, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12695, 1995 WL 735930
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1995·No. No. 95-956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State confesses error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to set aside illegal sentence on the grounds that the judge did not have jurisdiction to enter the sentences.

With regards to the first degree misdemeanor, the trial court erred in imposing a new probationary period without giving credit for time already served on probation. See State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla. 1994). Additionally, the court was without jurisdiction to impose a new sentence for the second degree misdemeanor charge. Once a defendant’s term of probation has expired, the trial court loses all jurisdiction over the defendant unless an affidavit of the probation’s violation or a motion to modify the probation has been filed before the term expires. Carroll v. Cochran, 140 So.2d 300 (Fla.1962); Davis v. State, 623 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Here, with regards to the second degree misdemeanor, affidavits were filed, but well after the probation expired. Because the court did not have jurisdiction over the defendant to revoke probation and impose a new sentence, we reverse. See Carroll, 140 So.2d at 301; Aguiar v. State, 593 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. State, 664 So. 2d 70, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12695, 1995 WL 735930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 70 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. State
670 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)