Bennett v. State

598 So. 2d 332, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6212, 1992 WL 114653
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1992·No. No. 91-1761·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

SHIVERS, Judge.

We affirm on the basis of State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), review granted, Case No. 78,900 (Fla. April 30, 1992), and Simmons v. State, 590 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), which was authored by Judge Wolf. We again certify the following question as one of great public importance:

HAS THE OBJECTIVE ENTRAPMENT TEST SET FORTH IN CRUZ V STATE, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985), cert, denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105, S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed. 2d 652 (1985), BEEN ABOLISHED BY THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 777.201, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987)?
MINER, J., concurs. WOLF, J., specially concurs, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. State, 598 So. 2d 332, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6212, 1992 WL 114653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 332 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinsey v. State
623 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)