Bennett v. State
588 So. 2d 691, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11368, 1991 WL 239916
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 588 So. 2d 672 →
Opinion
The state concedes that this matter must be remanded for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written probation order, to reflect that appellant violated only one condition of probation, in conformance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Longmire v. State, 456 So.2d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Carson v. State, 489 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of the written probation order in accordance with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. State, 588 So. 2d 691, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11368, 1991 WL 239916 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
588 So. 2d 691 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carson v. State
489 So. 2d 1236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Longmire v. State
456 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)