Bennett v. Norton

32 A. 1112, 171 Pa. 221, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1298
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 7, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 458
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 32 A. 1112 (Bennett v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Norton, 32 A. 1112, 171 Pa. 221, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1298 (Pa. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

The facts of this case, together with the questions involved, are so clearly and fully presented in the exhaustive opinion of the learned president of the court below, that further elaboration [243]*243is unnecessary. While there appears to have been some difference of opinion as to the construction of the tenth section of the act of 1834, the learned judge says : “We agree in all the findings of fact and in the general conclusion that the county commissioners have not authority to purchase land without the approval of two successive grand juries.” Assuming, therefore, the correctness of the findings of fact, we have considered all the questions necessarily involved, and are fully satisfied that the general conclusion unanimously reached by the court, as above stated, is entirely correct. That necessarily requires an affirmance of the decree, and renders any expression of opinion as to minor questions unnecessary.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Council v. Commissioner
65 T.C. 594 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)
Payne v. Kassab
312 A.2d 86 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Woodard v. Mordecai
67 S.E.2d 639 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Tremont Township School District v. Western Anthracite Coal Co.
75 Pa. D. & C. 225 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Haverford Township v. Siegle
28 A.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Central Surety & Ins. v. Dillard
184 Okla. 534 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
In Re Dillard's Estate
1939 OK 160 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
Commonwealth v. Briggs
34 Pa. D. & C. 97 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1938)
City of San Antonio v. Zogheib
70 S.W.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Gordon v. Winneberger
165 A. 408 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Fayette County Commissioners' Petition
137 A. 237 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Brewer v. Delaware County Commissioners
9 Pa. D. & C. 319 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Murdoch v. Biery
112 A. 772 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Wick v. Alworth
62 Pa. Super. 34 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Hughesville Borough School District v. Wolf Township School District
40 Pa. Super. 311 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Gumpert v. Hay
51 A. 968 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Commonwealth v. Gilligan
46 A. 124 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A. 1112, 171 Pa. 221, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-norton-pa-1895.