Bennett v. Abbott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Bennett v. Abbott

1916 OK 118, 154 P. 1156, 55 Okla. 197, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 133

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 1, 1916·No. 6142·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

On January 5, 1916, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, alleging therein that W. D. Coleman, one of the plaintiffs in error, died on December 14, 1914, that a joint judgment was rendered in the trial court against both of the plaintiffs in error, and that this action has not been revived in the name of the administrator of the estate of the said W. D. Coleman.

This appeal was perfected on March 12, 1914, and submitted December 13, 1915. There has been no effort made to revive the same. Following the rule laid down in McKay v. Watson et al., 40 Okla. 353, 137 Pac. 1177, we recommend that the appeal be dismissed..

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

On January 5, 1916, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, alleging therein that W. D. Coleman, one of the plaintiffs in error, died on December 14, 1914, that a joint judgment was rendered in the trial court against both of the plaintiffs in error, and that this action has not been revived in the name of the administrator of the estate of the said W. D. Coleman.

This appeal was perfected on March 12, 1914, and submitted December 13, 1915. There has been no effort made to revive the same. Following the rule laid down in McKay v. Watson et al., 40 Okla. 353, 137 Pac. 1177, we recommend that the appeal be dismissed..

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Bennett v. Abbott, 1916 OK 118, 154 P. 1156, 55 Okla. 197, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 133 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

1916 OK 118 (Bennett v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related